> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://intelligence.wildlandseco.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# Crop damage requires two models, not one map of where wild boar go
- URL: https://intelligence.wildlandseco.com/2026-10-27-wild-boar-visitation-versus-crop-damage/
- Published: 2026-10-27T13:23:07.000Z
- Updated: 2026-10-27T13:23:07.000Z
- Description: A French two-stage study distinguishes animal visitation from damage once a field is visited.
- Author: Benjamin Worlund
- Tags: Wildlife, Land, Methods, #ecological-intelligence, #brief-2026-10-27, #global-radar, #peer-reviewed, #geo-europe

Evidence

Peer-reviewed

Geography

Agricultural parcels, France

System

Wild-boar crop use and agricultural damage risk

## WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

Chassagneux and colleagues separated parcel selection by wild boar from conditional crop-damage occurrence. Maize and legumes could be highly vulnerable to damage despite relatively low use intensity; meadows ranked low in both measures, while forest-edge proximity often increased use and damage.

## WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

Prediction and mitigation should distinguish presence, exposure and consequence; counting animals on a property cannot by itself explain economic loss.

## CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

Patterns are derived from a particular crop landscape and validation sample, and proposed transfer to other regions/species requires fresh tests.

## SOURCE

Journal of Applied Ecology — Chassagneux et al. (23 Oct 2026)  
[View original evidence ↗](https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.70570?ref=intelligence.wildlandseco.com)

From the Morning Brief · 2026-10-27

[Read the full Morning Brief →](https://intelligence.wildlandseco.com/morning-brief-2026-10-27/)