WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS
A high-frequency eDNA metabarcoding dataset used the MiFish primer set at 211 coastal sites across more than 3,000 km of the Japanese archipelago. From January 2018 to March 2019, 690 samples were collected using one-time, monthly and biweekly schedules and paired with environmental metadata. The dataset contains detections assigned to 1,477 fish species across 171 families and was designed to expose fine-scale temporal community variation.
WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ
The contribution is the sampling architecture as much as the species list. Repeated eDNA sampling can show when a one-off biodiversity snapshot is likely to miss seasonal turnover and can provide a reusable benchmark for designing monitoring cadence.
CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY
This is a data descriptor based on 2018–2019 sampling, not a demonstration that every detection represents local abundance or residency. eDNA results depend on transport, primer performance, reference libraries and sampling conditions, and temporal resolution is uneven among sites.
SOURCE
Scientific Data — primary dataset paper
View original evidence ↗