Skip to content
Ecological Intelligence

Ecological evidence.
Independent perspective.
Explore Wild Lands ↗

Wild Lands / Ecological Intelligence

Sand extraction carried a measurable land-use signal in cross-country models

Econometric associations link extraction and land transformation across BRICS, G7 and Middle East/North Africa groups, not individual river impacts.

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
BRICS, G7 and Middle East/North Africa country groups; panel 1990–2022
System
Sand extraction; land-use change; environmental economic indicators

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

An econometric study of 1990–2022 country-level data related sand mining and other economic or policy variables to land-use change, ecological footprint and carbon emissions. The modeled long-run association between a one-percent increase in sand mining and land-use change was 0.223% in BRICS, 0.12% in G7 and 0.055% in MENA groups.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

Construction supply chains have environmental footprints beyond project boundaries. These national correlations are a reason to strengthen material accounting and site-specific river/coast assessments, not to substitute them.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

Macroeconomic regression does not isolate the ecological effect of a particular dredging or mining operation, establish a causal mechanism or quantify species losses. Group differences can reflect underlying policy and development patterns.

SOURCE

Sofi et al. · Discover Environment · cross-country econometric study (15 Oct 2026)
View original evidence ↗