Skip to content
Ecological Intelligence

Ecological evidence.
Independent perspective.
Explore Wild Lands ↗

Ecological Intelligence / Subject

Carnivores

Peer-reviewed Africa

Reintroduced hyenas used dense cover, water—and roads only when human pressure was low

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
Tswalu Kalahari Reserve, South Africa
System
Semi-arid reserve / large-carnivore landscape

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

Reintroduced spotted hyenas selected denser vegetation and areas near permanent water, avoided places without herbivores and waterholes near lodges, and used roads more under cooler or lower-traffic conditions. The study illustrates how ecological resources and human activity jointly structured use of a restored carnivore landscape.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

Reintroduction success depends on the spatial pattern of resources and disturbance after release, not simply on whether habitat is nominally protected.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

Only five reintroduced animals were studied in a fenced reserve without other top predators. The results describe space use in a particular reintroduction context, not a general habitat-selection rule for spotted hyenas.

SOURCE

Journal of Mammalogy — primary field tracking study
View original evidence ↗

Tracking five spotted hyenas in a fenced South African reserve links space use to vegetation, permanent water, prey and the timing of human disturbance.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →
Peer-reviewed Africa

Carnivore coexistence in southern Ethiopia looks partly like a husbandry problem, not only a wildlife-attitude problem

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
Woze-Degena landscape, southern Ethiopia
System
Human-modified pastoral and agropastoral landscape

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

A semi-structured survey of 920 household heads in seven villages documented reported livestock depredation primarily by spotted hyenas and then leopards. Conservation perceptions varied with depredation experience, herd size, education, gender and residence length, while poor husbandry was identified as a problem and enhanced guarding was widely favored as a response.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

Human–carnivore coexistence is shaped by the actual operating conditions of livestock keeping. Conservation messaging alone is unlikely to substitute for reducing avoidable losses, strengthening husbandry and designing mitigation around how people experience risk.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

This is a perception and self-report study, not direct monitoring of carnivore abundance or verified depredation events. Associations may reflect reporting and social factors, and the findings come from one southern Ethiopian landscape.

SOURCE

Environmental and Sustainability Indicators · Original evidence
View original evidence ↗

A seven-village survey links conservation perceptions to lived depredation risk and points toward guarding and livestock-management capacity as part of the coexistence equation.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →

Keep exploring

Follow the systems. Find the connections.

WildlifeLandWaterOceansClimateCitiesOne HealthGovernanceMethods / Monitoring
Browse the archive →