Skip to content
Ecological Intelligence

Ecological evidence.
Independent perspective.
Explore Wild Lands ↗

Ecological Intelligence / Subject

community change

White-nose syndrome is showing up in the Black Hills as a community shift, not only a species-by-species decline

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
Black Hills, South Dakota, USA
System
Temperate bat community

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

A study compared summer bat capture rates during early white-nose-syndrome invasion in 2017–2019 with 2022–2024, after the pathogen became established in the Black Hills. WNS-susceptible Myotis species declined steeply in captures, while several less-susceptible taxa increased, indicating a substantial change in the observed community.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

Disease can reorganize the community that monitoring encounters, not merely reduce a focal species. That changes how acoustic or capture baselines should be interpreted after invasion and makes ‘total bat activity’ a potentially misleading recovery metric.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

Capture rates are not complete population censuses and can respond to sampling conditions, habitat use and other ecological pressures. The authors themselves interpret the changes as reflecting WNS alongside broader ecological forces rather than assigning every trend to disease alone.

SOURCE

Journal of Mammalogy
View original evidence ↗

Summer captures fell steeply for WNS-susceptible Myotis after the fungus became established, while captures of less-susceptible taxa increased.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →

Common species can decline while local biodiversity looks surprisingly stable

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
Global multi-realm synthesis
System
Terrestrial, marine and freshwater assemblages

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

Researchers synthesized population trends from 129 studies spanning 4,748 sites. Formerly common species declined more strongly than rare species in terrestrial and marine assemblages; freshwater assemblages showed no clear directional pattern. Rare species present at the start also declined, while colonizing species partly compensated within the rarest abundance class.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

Stable local species richness can coexist with substantial community reorganization and loss of numerically dominant species. Because common species often carry a large share of biomass and ecosystem function, conservation dashboards that emphasize richness alone can miss meaningful functional erosion.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

The synthesis pools heterogeneous monitoring programs, taxa and time series. Abundance rank is relative within assemblages, and the study does not imply that rare species are secure; many rare species also declined.

SOURCE

Nature Communications · Original evidence
View original evidence ↗

A synthesis across 4,748 sites finds formerly common species declining more strongly than rare species in terrestrial and marine assemblages, exposing a blind spot in aggregate richness metrics.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →

Keep exploring

Follow the systems. Find the connections.

Browse the archive →