Skip to content
Ecological Intelligence

Ecological evidence.
Independent perspective.
Explore Wild Lands ↗

Ecological Intelligence / Subject

conservation planning

Peer-reviewed North America

A U.S. freshwater conservation map changes when resilience and connectivity are treated as properties of the network

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
Conterminous United States
System
Rivers, streams and small watersheds

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

The study scored HUC-12 watersheds for connectivity, condition, water availability and naturalness, then overlaid 91 freshwater biodiversity assessments. The resulting network covers 35% of the conterminous U.S.: 19% scored resilient and 16% restorable. It contains 67% of recognized biodiversity areas and 75% of free-flowing rivers; just 6% is both protected and resilient, while 14% is unprotected and restorable.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

The useful contribution is a decision surface rather than a single protection target. It separates places that are already resilient from places where restoration could change network function, making connectivity and climate context explicit in freshwater prioritization.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

This is a spatial prioritization framework, not evidence that conserving exactly 35% guarantees biodiversity persistence. Human water needs and many local implementation constraints are not embedded in the core network and must be layered into actual decisions.

SOURCE

PLOS ONE
View original evidence ↗

A continental planning analysis identifies a 35% freshwater network that combines representation, resilience, connectivity and biodiversity—but only 6% is both protected and resilient.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →
Peer-reviewed Latin America & Caribbean

The Tumbesian bird list grew by 16% after researchers mapped where people had not looked

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
Tumbesian region of Ecuador and Peru
System
Tropical dry and humid forests and associated habitats

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

A synthesis of more than 439,000 refined bird records identified 931 species in the Tumbesian region—about 16% more than previous estimates—including 24 new regional records and 82 endemic species. Sampling effort was strongly biased toward accessible coastal and protected areas; humid forests held the greatest recorded richness but only about half of estimated sampling completeness.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

Conservation maps inherit survey effort. Apparent gaps in biodiversity can be gaps in observation, so prioritization should carry information about sampling completeness alongside richness and formal protection.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

The analysis synthesizes occurrence records rather than standardized abundance surveys, and completeness estimates depend on the underlying data and modeling choices. More records do not automatically indicate increasing bird populations.

SOURCE

Conservation Science and Practice · Original evidence
View original evidence ↗

More than 439,000 records reveal major sampling gaps in the Ecuador–Peru hotspot, including incompletely surveyed humid forests that can distort richness and protection assessments.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →
Peer-reviewed

Fire hotspots and biodiversity hotspots overlap enough in the Zagros to change where monitoring should concentrate

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
Southern Zagros Mountains, Iran
System
Mountain forest, steppe and rangeland mosaic

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

Researchers mapped 13,419 fires from 2000–2023, identified statistically significant spatiotemporal fire clusters, and overlaid them with modeled habitat value for 108 vertebrate species. About 60% of burned area fell within high-value ecological zones, including potential ranges of multiple Red Listed species.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

The analysis turns a generic fire-risk map into a triage tool by asking where repeated fire exposure and modeled biodiversity value coincide. That can focus field verification and prevention where ecological stakes are highest.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

The study maps exposure and modeled habitat value, not pre- versus post-fire population change or impact severity. Species distributions were modeled with MaxEnt, and the authors explicitly lacked direct before-and-after biodiversity data.

SOURCE

Environmental and Sustainability Indicators · Original evidence
View original evidence ↗

A 2000–2023 remote-sensing analysis layers recurrent wildfire clusters with modeled vertebrate richness to identify conservation priority zones.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →

Keep exploring

Follow the systems. Find the connections.

WildlifeLandWaterOceansClimateCitiesOne HealthGovernanceMethods / Monitoring
Browse the archive →