Skip to content
Ecological Intelligence

Ecological evidence.
Independent perspective.
Explore Wild Lands ↗

Ecological Intelligence / Subject

forest resilience

Coast-redwood leaves crossed a photosynthetic heat threshold before air temperature told the whole story

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
Garcia River Forest, Mendocino County, California, USA
System
Coast redwood forest

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

Repeated lower-canopy measurements from three young coast redwoods over two years showed leaf temperatures frequently exceeded air temperature during summer stress, with leaf-to-air differences reaching 10°C. Photosynthetic efficiency fell as leaves warmed, and controlled temperature-response curves showed net photosynthesis declining above about 30°C with steeper losses above 35°C. Internal CO₂ remained high during much of the decline, supporting a non-stomatal biochemical limitation rather than stomatal closure alone.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

Air temperature is an incomplete exposure metric when leaves can decouple from it. For redwood monitoring, leaf thermal status and water stress may reveal physiological limits that a weather station alone misses.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

The field physiology comes from three young trees, lower-canopy branches and one second-growth forest; temperature-response curves used detached, well-watered branches. Leaf-level responses do not directly quantify whole-tree growth, mortality or stand-level carbon sequestration.

SOURCE

JGR: Biogeosciences — primary study
View original evidence ↗

Two years of leaf physiology in Mendocino County found redwood leaves could run up to 10°C warmer than air, with photosynthesis declining above about 30°C and more steeply above 35°C.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →

Forests can become more productive while becoming less resilient

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
Global forests
System
Boreal, temperate and tropical forests

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

A 2001–2021 global remote-sensing analysis found that more than one-third of forests simultaneously gained gross primary productivity while losing resilience. Rising vapour pressure deficit was the strongest driver of resilience loss, and non-intact forests were about twice as sensitive to resilience decline as intact forests.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

Carbon uptake and productivity are not reliable stand-alone proxies for forest stability. A forest can look productive in near-term flux metrics while becoming more vulnerable to drought, heat or disturbance; structural simplification appears to amplify that vulnerability.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

Resilience is inferred from remote-sensing time-series behavior rather than measured as direct mortality risk. Relationships differ among forest types, and productivity–water-use coupling can reflect stomatal constraint rather than improved physiological performance.

SOURCE

Communications Earth & Environment · Original evidence
View original evidence ↗

Global remote sensing shows rising atmospheric aridity can increase or maintain productivity even as resilience erodes, especially in structurally simplified forests.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →

Keep exploring

Follow the systems. Find the connections.

Browse the archive →