One national park can contain very different fire regimes
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS
MODIS records from 2002–2022 showed strong spatial differences in fire across Hwange National Park. Roughly 37% of the park burned at least once, but the Robins section had far more recurrent burning than Makona, and total annual burned area did not show a significant park-wide temporal trend. Fire patterns also varied with vegetation, temperature and precipitation.
WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ
A protected-area average can conceal operationally important fire heterogeneity. Management units may need different monitoring and fire strategies even inside a single legal boundary.
CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY
Satellite burned-area products capture fire occurrence more readily than ecological severity, ignition cause or population response. The study is observational, and section-level patterns should not be interpreted as proof that one fire regime is optimal.
SOURCE
Journal of Applied Ecology · Original evidence
View original evidence ↗
Two decades of satellite data from Hwange, Zimbabwe, show strong internal variation in burned area and recurrence even where park-wide totals show no significant trend.
Read the Wild Lands assessment →