Amazon Delta mapping shows that local ecological value is organized around relationships, not isolated resource points
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS
A People and Nature study used social cartography, photovoice, workshops, interviews and guided territorial excursions over more than two years with the Jubim community. Participants mapped 65 georeferenced places and documented 73 plant and animal species connected to food, mobility, identity, spiritual practice and other material and relational contributions of nature. Community validation and co-authorship were built into the process.
WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ
The result is a reminder that management units drawn around one resource can miss how people actually use and understand a landscape. Participatory mapping can surface ecological connections and decision-relevant places that conventional biophysical inventories may not capture.
CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY
This is deep, place-based qualitative and participatory research in one community, not a prevalence estimate for the Amazon Delta. Its value is contextual and relational; methods and governance arrangements need to be rebuilt with other communities rather than copied as a universal template.
SOURCE
People and Nature
View original evidence ↗
Two years of participatory research in a Marajó fishing community mapped 65 places and 73 species tied to material and cultural benefits, showing how wetlands, forests, waterways and knowledge function as one territorial system.
Read the Wild Lands assessment →