Skip to content
Ecological Intelligence

Ecological evidence.
Independent perspective.
Explore Wild Lands ↗

Ecological Intelligence / Subject

neonicotinoids

Stable fungal richness did not mean neonicotinoid-treated soil communities were unchanged

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
Controlled soil microcosm, Australia
System
Agricultural soil

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

Australian soil microcosms exposed to seed-treatment neonicotinoids showed relatively stable overall fungal alpha diversity across most comparisons, but treatment-by-time effects altered community composition. Early diversity declines appeared under some compounds, and clothianidin produced the strongest set of discriminatory taxa along with a shift toward more saprotrophic and fewer symbiotrophic assignments.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

For managers who use soil biology as a stewardship indicator, the monitoring lesson is to preserve timing and community composition. A single richness measure can look stable while community structure changes, so any field monitoring tied to pesticide decisions should use endpoints matched to the management question rather than assume diversity alone captures response.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

This was a controlled microcosm experiment, not a field crop trial. Functional guilds are inferred from fungal taxonomy rather than measured ecosystem-process rates, exposure and mixture dynamics differ in real soils, and the study does not establish a universal yield, soil-health or management consequence.

SOURCE

Microbial Ecology
View original evidence ↗

In soil microcosms, overall fungal diversity stayed mostly stable while composition shifted through time; clothianidin was associated with more discriminatory taxa and a higher saprotroph/lower symbiotroph signal.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →

Keep exploring

Follow the systems. Find the connections.

Browse the archive →