Skip to content
Ecological Intelligence

Ecological evidence.
Independent perspective.
Explore Wild Lands ↗

Wild Lands / Ecological Intelligence

The mine footprint was only a fraction of the forest loss

A continent-scale causal-inference study estimated extensive off-site deforestation around mines across sub-Saharan Africa.

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
Sub-Saharan Africa; 16,627 mines evaluated over 2001–2020
System
Mining-related deforestation and land-use spillovers

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

Using land-use change data and difference-in-differences comparisons at 16,627 mines, researchers estimated 187,000 hectares of direct dense-forest loss. They attributed a further 8.0-percentage-point increase in forest clearing within 1 km relative to comparison areas, with effects detectable as far as 20 km. On average, each hectare of directly mined forest was associated with 34 additional hectares of off-site loss within five years.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

Environmental impact assessments that only map the excavated site can miss the landscape created around it: roads, settlements, agriculture and induced access. This June study is included as an uncovered foundational result, not misrepresented as a new October paper.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

These are modeled counterfactual estimates from historical satellite land-use data, not direct attribution of every cleared hectare to one operator. Mine types, contexts and spatial/time horizons vary; the 34-to-1 is a continental average, not a universal project multiplier.

SOURCE

Nature — Morton et al. (3 Jun 2026)
View original evidence ↗