WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS
Survey modeling found greater reported wildlife damage correlated with livelihood threat and intentions to diversify toward tourism. Threat was associated with perceived tourism usefulness but had no clear association with tourism self-efficacy.
WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ
Creating an alternative livelihood opportunity and equipping local residents to use it are separate governance tasks.
CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY
Cross-sectional survey intentions do not demonstrate real occupational transitions or causal effects of wildlife damage.
SOURCE
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution — Zheng et al. (30 Oct 2026)
View original evidence ↗
