Black ash wetlands lost carbon after both borer-like dieoff and intervention
A 12-year Minnesota experiment separates immediate carbon accounting from the long task of replacing an ash canopy.
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS
Across experimental black ash wetlands, scientists compared undisturbed controls with girdling as a proxy for emerald ash borer mortality, clearcuts and group selection of about one-fifth of canopy. Twelve years later, all treatments contained less total ecosystem carbon than controls, with the greatest loss after clearcutting. Girdled sites held about 22% less total carbon and substantial decomposing deadwood. Soil-carbon differences were variable and not statistically detected.
WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ
The carbon outcome depends on living biomass, stored deadwood, regeneration and time. Neither leaving ash to die nor removing it automatically substitutes for establishing a healthy successor canopy; compare management options with long-term carbon and habitat objectives.
CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY
Girdling imitates tree mortality but not every mechanism of an actual borer outbreak. The 12-year experiment does not determine eventual soil-carbon trajectories or establish one universal harvesting prescription.
SOURCE
Ecosystems — Clark et al., 29 October 2026
View original evidence ↗
