Skip to content
Ecological Intelligence

Ecological evidence.
Independent perspective.
Explore Wild Lands ↗

Ecological Intelligence / Subject

monitoring design

Peer-reviewed Europe

In suburban monitoring, big moths were only a partial proxy for the smaller ones

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
Suburban Basel, Switzerland; two light traps over 2016–2021, with one relocated in the final year
System
Suburban biodiversity; nocturnal insects; indicator selection

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

Two light traps sampled suburban sites near Basel over six years, with one relocated in the final year. Researchers identified 17,404 moths representing 515 species. Annual samples of larger moths, especially noctuids, moderately predicted smaller-moth diversity, while geometrids were not dependable surrogates and weekly predictions were weaker and season-dependent.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

City biodiversity dashboards are most useful when their 'indicator species' assumption is tested. Selecting one tractable group can save monitoring effort, but proxy relationships may vary by season and different neighborhoods.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

The study sampled two traps across three locations, not all urban habitats or insect groups. Site relocation, weather, phenology and identification effort constrain transferability; moderate association is not full community coverage.

SOURCE

Schmera et al. · Biodiversity and Conservation · suburban moth monitoring
View original evidence ↗

Six years of Swiss light traps show why a shortcut to urban biodiversity depends on taxon and time scale.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →
Government data North America

The world’s longest-running broad-scale wildlife survey is being redesigned around bias, precision and cost

Evidence
Government data
Geography
Eastern Canada and Maine, USA
System
Migratory waterfowl breeding landscapes

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

USGS and partner agencies are evaluating alternative designs for the eastern portion of the Waterfowl Breeding Population and Habitat Survey, integrating existing aerial survey platforms and simulating how changes would affect bias, precision and cost. The redesign is intended to preserve the long-term population evidence used in harvest management while reducing logistical inefficiency.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

Long-running ecological monitoring becomes infrastructure: changing it can improve efficiency, but only if continuity, bias and decision requirements are treated as design constraints rather than afterthoughts.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

This is a survey-redesign project, not a new waterfowl population estimate. Alternative configurations are still being evaluated, so no single replacement design should be treated as final.

SOURCE

U.S. Geological Survey · Monitoring-design project
View original evidence ↗

USGS, Canadian and U.S. wildlife agencies are testing how to modernize the Eastern Breeding Waterfowl Survey without weakening the population evidence behind harvest decisions.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →

Keep exploring

Follow the systems. Find the connections.

WildlifeLandWaterOceansClimateCitiesOne HealthGovernanceMethods / Monitoring
Browse the archive →