Skip to content
Ecological Intelligence

Ecological evidence.
Independent perspective.
Explore Wild Lands ↗

Ecological Intelligence / Subject

participatory mapping

Belize mangrove priorities look different when the community draws the map

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
Placencia Lagoon, Belize
System
Mangroves / coastal livelihoods / participatory planning

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

Five community workshops combined high-resolution habitat baselines and InVEST modeling. The participants prioritized 83 hectares of degraded mangroves for restoration and 174 hectares of healthy stands for protection, with a larger 752-hectare lagoon protection scenario. Researchers modeled possible blue-carbon, spiny lobster, tourism and sociocultural benefits.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

The useful bridge is between local ecological knowledge, a real map at implementation scale and assumptions financiers can inspect. Community priorities cannot be replaced by national extent maps; plausible benefits still require implementation and monitoring.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

Modeling assumes restored stands deliver healthy-mangrove benefits after ten years. The estimated carbon, catch and revenue are conditional scenarios, not realized gains or proven investment returns.

SOURCE

Landscape Ecology — Delevaux et al. (2026)
View original evidence ↗

Placencia residents identified 83 hectares for restoration and 174 for protection; prospective benefits are modeled, not achieved.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →

Amazon Delta mapping shows that local ecological value is organized around relationships, not isolated resource points

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
Jubim, Marajó Archipelago, Amazon Delta, Brazil
System
Amazon Delta floodplain, forest and fishing social–ecological landscape

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

A People and Nature study used social cartography, photovoice, workshops, interviews and guided territorial excursions over more than two years with the Jubim community. Participants mapped 65 georeferenced places and documented 73 plant and animal species connected to food, mobility, identity, spiritual practice and other material and relational contributions of nature. Community validation and co-authorship were built into the process.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

The result is a reminder that management units drawn around one resource can miss how people actually use and understand a landscape. Participatory mapping can surface ecological connections and decision-relevant places that conventional biophysical inventories may not capture.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

This is deep, place-based qualitative and participatory research in one community, not a prevalence estimate for the Amazon Delta. Its value is contextual and relational; methods and governance arrangements need to be rebuilt with other communities rather than copied as a universal template.

SOURCE

People and Nature
View original evidence ↗

Two years of participatory research in a Marajó fishing community mapped 65 places and 73 species tied to material and cultural benefits, showing how wetlands, forests, waterways and knowledge function as one territorial system.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →

Keep exploring

Follow the systems. Find the connections.

Browse the archive →