A salmon supply chain made climate responsibility an institutional problem
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS
A qualitative international-business analysis published October 16 examines a multinational salmon supply chain in which a parent company and its British subsidiary coordinated suppliers operating under differing national institutions. The paper traces how reporting expectations and local practices shape work on indirect supply-chain emissions.
WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ
Environmental ambition becomes measurable only when buyers, farms, reporting methods and verification systems can act together. A supplier code or climate target is not, by itself, a measured ecological outcome.
CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY
Interview and documentary evidence describe governance and coordination; they do not independently verify actual emissions reductions, fish welfare improvements or additional conservation outcomes.
SOURCE
Management International Review · salmon supply-chain institutional study
View original evidence ↗
Interviews with a seafood company illuminate why Scope 3 action depends on the rules surrounding suppliers.
Read the Wild Lands assessment →