Skip to content
Ecological Intelligence

Ecological evidence.
Independent perspective.
Explore Wild Lands ↗

Ecological Intelligence / Subject

caribou

A caribou's loyalty to home can become a liability after disturbance

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
Canadian boreal forest
System
Boreal forest / caribou home ranges / fire and harvest

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

GPS records from 331 boreal caribou across 667,000 square kilometres show that fidelity to familiar low-disturbance ranges was associated with lower mortality. Remaining faithful to severely disturbed ranges, especially regenerating harvest areas, was instead associated with increased mortality; recent forest disturbance also prompted range shifts.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

Conservation needs to consider the possibility that past habitat familiarity can become a liability. A caribou range remains mapped as occupied even while its function as a safe home deteriorates; connected refuges matter alongside static protection maps.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

An observational survival and telemetry analysis cannot establish every mortality mechanism or prove that inducing dispersal improves survival.

SOURCE

Landscape Ecology — caribou telemetry research (2026)
View original evidence ↗

Tracking 331 boreal caribou links site fidelity with survival—but the direction depends on forest disturbance.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →

Young clearcuts attracted caribou forage and potentially greater risk

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
West-central British Columbia, Canada
System
Boreal forest; caribou foraging; forestry and predator exposure

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

A study using 71 caribou GPS datasets, 56 paired vegetation plots and 149 predator-camera stations found relatively recent harvested stands could provide forage resources selected by caribou while also coinciding with greater modeled wolf exposure. Habitat selection and predator exposure did not map onto a single good-versus-bad treatment label.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

Management must compare what animals gain from a site with the encounter risks they inherit there. Reforestation, harvest configuration and predator ecology are linked decisions rather than independent habitat metrics.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

Predator exposure was inferred from monitored patterns, not measured mortality or population growth; telemetry selection does not demonstrate net fitness benefits. This study does not establish a universal clearcut age threshold.

SOURCE

Landscape Ecology · caribou forest-selection field analysis
View original evidence ↗

Paired vegetation and predator observations distinguish nutritional opportunity from safety.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →

Keep exploring

Follow the systems. Find the connections.

Browse the archive →