Skip to content
Ecological Intelligence

Ecological evidence.
Independent perspective.
Explore Wild Lands ↗

Ecological Intelligence / Subject

deadwood

Dead logs hosted the richest slime-mold assemblages in one Araucaria forest

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
São Francisco de Paula National Forest, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
System
Araucaria forest / deadwood microhabitat

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

Sampling dead logs, branches, twigs, leaf litter and living plants at three locations yielded 160 slime-mold specimens in 30 taxa. Dead logs had the highest mean richness and abundance, and community composition differed among the five substrates. Two taxa were newly recorded for Rio Grande do Sul.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

A stand's biodiversity cannot be inferred from tree cover alone; decomposition substrates create important, distinct microhabitats worth noticing in habitat inventories.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

The team sampled just 15 units at three points and did not quantify how much of each substrate was available. Higher recorded richness on logs cannot be translated into an experimentally established habitat preference or generalized to all Araucaria forests.

SOURCE

Mycological Progress — Velloso et al. (2026)
View original evidence ↗

A fine-scale Brazilian substrate survey argues for looking below the canopy when assessing forest biodiversity.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →

Forest reserve size mattered, but different taxa responded to different habitat features

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
44 riparian, upland and mountain forest reserves, Central Europe
System
Protected forest reserves; beetles; spiders; birds; soil fungi

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

Researchers measured diversity of beetles, spiders, birds and soil fungi in 44 protected forests. Fungi, beetle and spider diversity increased with reserve size; bird diversity showed interactions between reserve size and surrounding forest cover, while certain forest specialists showed no simple area response. Deadwood, canopy-height diversity and tree microhabitats had different relationships to different taxa.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

The area available to ecological processes matters, but structure and forest context determine which organisms benefit. Reserve design should consider expansion and forest-specific habitat features rather than declaring success from total hectares or one focal species.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

The study is observational across three forest types, and measured associations need not indicate effects caused by reserve designation. Individual taxonomic groups and local forest specialists differed markedly.

SOURCE

Huber et al. · Biodiversity and Conservation · 44 forest reserves
View original evidence ↗

A 44-reserve European comparison complicates the idea of one universal biodiversity indicator.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →

Keep exploring

Follow the systems. Find the connections.

Browse the archive →