Skip to content
Ecological Intelligence

Ecological evidence.
Independent perspective.
Explore Wild Lands ↗

Ecological Intelligence / Subject

fragmentation

Peer-reviewed Global

A roads meta-analysis found an average wildlife cost—and big uncertainty

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
Studies spanning multiple world regions
System
Road corridors; terrestrial wildlife communities

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

Reviewers fitted three-level models to 643 effect estimates from 160 studies. On the log-response-ratio scale, wildlife outcomes near roads averaged about 32% lower, but the standardized mean difference and correlation estimates had confidence intervals crossing zero. Prediction intervals spanned positive and negative responses; traffic volume was reported for only 91 effects.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

An average road effect is not an adequate crossing-location or mitigation design. Species, outcome type, traffic exposure and nearby habitat all matter; mixed effect scales should not be silently collapsed into a single universal loss percentage.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

Effects were heterogeneous and most studies did not supply standardized traffic-volume information. This synthesis is observational across studies and does not prove a single causal road response for all taxa or habitats.

SOURCE

Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution — primary systematic review and meta-analysis
View original evidence ↗

A synthesis of 160 studies found a roughly 32% reduction on one effect scale, while other effect metrics were uncertain and site results varied greatly.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →
Peer-reviewed Global

Emerging-disease geography has an anthropogenic fingerprint—but not one ecological driver

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
Global; 169 countries
System
Human–animal disease landscapes / One Health

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

Researchers harmonized 58,319 outbreak events for 32 diseases and tested 16 social and environmental drivers while modeling reporting bias. Outbreak risk was often higher in forested, fragmented mosaic landscapes with people and livestock, and several vector-borne diseases shared strong responses to fragmentation and long-term drying. Directly transmitted zoonoses shared few consistent drivers. Reporting declined by a median 32% for each additional hour of travel time to a health facility.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

The study weakens the search for one global ecological lever against emerging disease. Landscape intervention can matter, but prevention and surveillance need to be pathogen- and place-specific—and healthcare access is itself part of the observed disease map.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

The analysis is observational and assembled from heterogeneous surveillance systems, with sparse data for several high-concern pathogens. Associations are not causal estimates for individual diseases, and under-detection remains a central limitation.

SOURCE

Nature
View original evidence ↗

A global analysis of 58,319 outbreak records finds shared landscape signals for several vector-borne diseases, while directly transmitted zoonoses show far less consistent environmental patterning.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →
Peer-reviewed Global

Tropical rainforests lost 18% of undisturbed cover since 1990 while edge exposure increased

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
Pantropical rainforest regions, 1990–2023
System
Tropical rainforests

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

Annual tropical land-use maps from 1990–2023 indicate an 18.1% loss of undisturbed rainforest cover. Losses were uneven: about 25% in Asia, 14.8% in Africa and 14.5% in the Americas, with especially large regional declines in Southeast Asia, West Africa, the Amazon deforestation arc and Central America. The area of remaining forest within 100 metres of an edge increased by about 6.6%, showing that fragmentation rose alongside outright loss.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

Forest area and forest configuration are different conservation variables. A landscape can retain mapped rainforest while exposing more of it to edge-related changes in microclimate, disturbance and access. Monitoring only net area can therefore understate how much interior habitat and ecological continuity have changed.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

The analysis depends on remote-sensing classifications and a fixed 100-m edge-distance metric. Edge exposure is a structural proxy, not a direct measurement of biodiversity loss or microclimatic change at every site.

SOURCE

Scientific Reports · Original evidence
View original evidence ↗

Annual land-use maps show forest loss and fragmentation moving together across the tropics, with especially large declines in Southeast Asia and West Africa.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →

Keep exploring

Follow the systems. Find the connections.

WildlifeLandWaterOceansClimateCitiesOne HealthGovernanceMethods / Monitoring
Browse the archive →