Skip to content
Ecological Intelligence

Ecological evidence.
Independent perspective.
Explore Wild Lands ↗

Ecological Intelligence / Subject

ecosystem services

Peer-reviewed Latin America & Caribbean

What Pan-Amazon defaunation research still cannot tell us

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
Pan-Amazon basin; literature concentrated in Brazil and Peru
System
Tropical forests; terrestrial and aquatic wildlife; ecosystem services

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

A review assembled 135 Pan-Amazon defaunation studies and assessed how directly they measured ecological and human consequences. Evidence concentrates on hunted or fished vertebrates and provisioning contributions; cultural dimensions, invertebrate roles and measured consequences for ecosystem functions remain much more weakly documented. The geography of the literature is uneven, especially across the basin.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

An intact-looking forest canopy cannot establish whether the animal-mediated processes on which a functioning ecosystem depends are still intact. More informative stewardship couples abundance and harvesting measures with seed dispersal, regeneration, local livelihoods and community priorities, while acknowledging what has not been studied.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

The review maps published evidence and research gaps; it is not a basin-wide field estimate of wildlife decline or a direct demonstration of a particular ecosystem-service collapse. Brazil/Peru sampling and research attention are not representative of every Amazonian community or taxon.

SOURCE

Biodiversity and Conservation · Pan-Amazon defaunation evidence synthesis
View original evidence ↗

A synthesis of 135 studies exposes a gap between evidence of wildlife loss and direct measurements of what that loss changes for people and ecosystems.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →
Peer-reviewed

Bangladesh’s urban tree-canopy benefits are distributed unevenly—and the numbers are model outputs, not field measurements

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
City corporations of Bangladesh
System
Urban forest / city landscape

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

The study used i-Tree Canopy to estimate land cover and tree-related ecosystem services across Bangladesh’s city corporations. Modeled services varied sharply among cities, with Barishal ranking strongly while Dhaka South, Gazipur and Narayanganj showed larger deficits and spatial inequities. The authors also identify a gap between environmental policy frameworks and implementation.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

The useful planning signal is distribution, not a national average. Urban canopy functions as infrastructure only when trees are actually located where heat, runoff, air quality and access needs occur—and modeled service estimates should guide field verification rather than substitute for it.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

The ecosystem-service values are model-based estimates rather than direct flux measurements, and monetary values inherit i-Tree assumptions. Cross-city comparisons can identify priorities but do not by themselves establish causal benefits or local maintenance performance.

SOURCE

Discover Sustainability — primary urban-canopy modeling study
View original evidence ↗

An all-city-corporation i-Tree analysis estimates large differences in air-pollution removal, carbon and stormwater services while highlighting implementation gaps in urban environmental policy.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →
Peer-reviewed

Coastal wetland restoration does not mature along one smooth recovery curve

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
Eastern Australia
System
Restored mangrove and saltmarsh wetlands

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

Researchers compared restored coastal wetlands spanning roughly 6–33 years since restoration in eastern Australia, using a space-for-time design to examine vegetation and soil traits associated with ecosystem services. Different attributes followed different trajectories through time rather than converging along one simple linear recovery curve.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

Restoration age is a weak substitute for ecological function when different processes recover at different rates. Monitoring plans should therefore track the specific functions or traits tied to project objectives instead of assuming that an older site is uniformly closer to reference condition.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

The study uses a chronosequence rather than repeated measurements of the same sites over decades. Site history, hydrology and landscape context can be confounded with restoration age, and trait recovery does not guarantee every ecosystem service.

SOURCE

Ecological Applications · Original evidence
View original evidence ↗

Restored saltmarsh and mangrove sites aged 6–33 years showed different, often nonlinear trajectories in traits linked to ecosystem services.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →
Peer-reviewed Global

Peatland restoration delivers far more climate benefit when location is treated as part of the intervention

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
Global inland peatlands
System
Drained inland peatlands

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

A spatial optimization framework compared restoration strategies across drained inland peatlands. Restoring 30% of drained area where greenhouse-gas reductions were highest produced an estimated 0.91 ± 0.17 Pg CO2e per year of emissions reduction, versus 0.27 ± 0.11 Pg CO2e per year for a randomized allocation. Strategies prioritizing water quality or flood mitigation still retained substantial climate benefits, while the best near-term locations did not always align with areas expected to minimize future methane emissions.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

The important signal is not simply that peatlands matter for climate. It is that restoration geography and objective-setting can change the return on the same amount of effort by multiples. A portfolio designed around carbon, flood mitigation or water quality will not be identical, but the study shows room to find co-benefit rather than treating objectives as automatically competing.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

This is a global optimization model, not a site-level restoration prescription. Results depend on mapped peatland extent, emissions factors and assumed restoration effects; local feasibility, land tenure, hydrology and future methane dynamics can change priorities.

SOURCE

Ecological Applications · Original evidence
View original evidence ↗

A global optimization study found that restoring the right 30% of drained inland peatlands could cut roughly three times more greenhouse-gas emissions than restoring the same area without climate-based targeting.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →
Peer-reviewed Global

Global saline lakes — Low species counts can hide high conservation value

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
Global saline lakes
System
Saline lakes and surrounding terrestrial food webs

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

Researchers evaluated biodiversity and ecosystem services across 85 saline lakes worldwide and recorded 200 threatened or near-threatened species. Birds accounted for 53% of the threatened species documented, reflecting the importance of saline lakes as feeding, nesting and stopover habitat. The study also found culturally and economically important services that are often difficult to quantify.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

A system can look species-poor under a narrow aquatic inventory while supporting conservation value through terrestrial linkages, migratory use and ecosystem services. Local richness alone is therefore a weak proxy for what would be lost if these lakes decline.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

The study synthesizes heterogeneous lakes and combines ecological evidence with expert assessment of ecosystem services. It should not be read as one universal valuation formula for every saline lake.

SOURCE

Nature Communications · Original evidence
View original evidence ↗

An assessment of 85 saline lakes finds threatened terrestrial species, high ecosystem-level diversity and important services that conventional freshwater metrics can overlook.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →

Keep exploring

Follow the systems. Find the connections.

WildlifeLandWaterOceansClimateCitiesOne HealthGovernanceMethods / Monitoring
Browse the archive →