Skip to content
Ecological Intelligence

Ecological evidence.
Independent perspective.
Explore Wild Lands ↗

Ecological Intelligence / Subject

Indigenous knowledge

Peer-reviewed Africa

Indigenous tracking mapped a 22,000-km² wildlife corridor that conventional surveys struggle to cover

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
Western Kgalagadi Conservation Corridor, Botswana
System
Kalahari multiuse wildlife-management areas

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

Researchers combined biannual track surveys by Indigenous certified trackers with a density-estimation framework across roughly 22,000 km² over three years. The team analyzed 22,793 tracks from 13 large-herbivore and carnivore species collected along 6,222 km of transects. Some herbivores declined over the study period while carnivore densities showed no detected change. Cattleposts were negatively associated with most species; burned areas, vegetation and distance to mineral pans had species-specific associations. Predictive maps identified higher-density areas and potential movement pathways away from concentrated human activity.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

The important method signal is that monitoring can be built around knowledge already adapted to the landscape. In sandy systems where tracks are persistent and expert identification is available, Indigenous tracking can generate spatially extensive wildlife information at a scale that would be costly to reproduce with cameras or captures alone. The land-use result also keeps the corridor problem concrete: multiuse land can remain functional for wildlife while becoming less permeable around sedentary livestock infrastructure.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

Track-density estimators depend on assumptions about track accumulation, animal movement, detectability and correct identification; they are not direct censuses. Associations with cattleposts, fire, vegetation and pans are observational rather than experimental. The approach also depends on suitable substrate and highly skilled trackers, so the exact method is not automatically transferable to every landscape.

SOURCE

Conservation Biology — primary study
View original evidence ↗

Over three years in Botswana’s Kalahari, certified trackers logged 22,793 tracks across 6,222 km; cattleposts were negatively associated with most of 13 monitored species, while burned areas produced mixed responses.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →
Global

Ecological restoration standards now put reference models, monitoring and knowledge pluralism into one framework

Evidence
Authoritative professional standard / policy article
Geography
Global
System
Ecological restoration practice

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

The Society for Ecological Restoration’s third-edition international principles and standards organizes restoration around eight principles and updates guidance on reference models, assessment, planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. It also formalizes the role of multiple knowledge systems and revised recovery-scale concepts.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

Standards matter when they change the questions a project is expected to answer. Requiring explicit references, trajectories, monitoring and social context can make restoration more auditable and reduce the tendency to treat implementation itself as evidence of recovery.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

This is a consensus professional framework, not an experiment demonstrating that projects following it outperform alternatives. Application still depends on ecosystem, governance, resources and local knowledge, and the framework should guide rather than replace site-specific judgment.

SOURCE

Restoration Ecology
View original evidence ↗

The third edition of the international restoration standards updates the field’s common framework for planning, reference ecosystems, monitoring and the integration of scientific, Indigenous, local and practitioner knowledge.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →
Arctic

Community-based Inuit surveillance detected an emerging caribou disease outbreak

Evidence
Peer-reviewed community-based wildlife health surveillance
Geography
Nunavut, Canadian Arctic
System
Barren-ground caribou and Arctic food system

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

A community-based surveillance program working with Inuit harvesters documented visible lesions and filarial nematodes in harvested barren-ground caribou, including Setaria yehi and Onchocerca lineage 2. The study links local observations, veterinary investigation and molecular identification to characterize syndromes that conventional wildlife-health systems could otherwise miss across a remote landscape.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

The important result is as much about surveillance architecture as the parasites themselves. Harvesters operate across places and seasons that formal monitoring samples sparsely, so durable community partnerships can create earlier, geographically richer wildlife-health intelligence while keeping observations connected to food security and local knowledge.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

The observations do not establish a population-wide prevalence trend or prove that climate change caused the infections. Sampling is tied to subsistence harvest rather than a randomized population survey, and the study does not quantify human food-safety risk. Climate sensitivity is a plausible ecological context, not a single demonstrated causal pathway.

SOURCE

Scientific Reports
View original evidence ↗

Community-based surveillance in Nunavut documented filarial infections and lesions in barren-ground caribou, showing how Indigenous harvesting networks can extend wildlife-health detection across a rapidly changing Arctic.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →
Commentary Arctic

Iñupiat observations exposed an Arctic model miss that conventional validation overlooked

Evidence
Commentary
Geography
Arctic Alaska, USA
System
Arctic Ocean, sea ice and subsistence marine systems

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

Working with the Alaska Arctic Observatory and Knowledge Hub, researchers used seasonal calendars to compare Iñupiat narrated observations with an Arctic Ocean hindcast. The model generally captured seasonal timing but predicted 2019 freeze-up too early; observers documented late freeze-up, storminess and unusually difficult hunting conditions that were not adequately represented by conventional evaluation alone.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

Co-production can improve models not by converting Indigenous Knowledge into another validation dataset, but by changing what scientists ask the model to represent and which errors matter for decisions. The paper also foregrounds data sovereignty and Indigenous authority in the research process.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

This is a perspective and methods demonstration from an ongoing Alaska collaboration, not a broad benchmark proving that every co-produced model is more accurate. Some model-development steps and decision outcomes remain prospective.

SOURCE

Communications Earth & Environment · Perspective
View original evidence ↗

A new modeling framework pairs Indigenous seasonal observations with ocean simulations, using mismatches in sea-ice timing and harvest-relevant conditions to redirect model development.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →
Peer-reviewed Latin America & Caribbean

Arhuaco water governance research points to co-governance—not substitution—as the resilient pathway

Evidence
Peer-reviewed
Geography
Upper Ariguaní River basin, Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia
System
Mountain watershed and Indigenous territory

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

The study combined 48 community surveys, interviews and participatory mapping with 2000–2023 land-cover analysis and a dynamic socio-hydrological model. Indigenous norms and ritual practices remain central to water management, while agricultural expansion and forest loss increase pressure; modeled scenarios suggest Indigenous governance can slow deterioration but that co-governance with state institutions is more robust under mounting pressure.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

The result argues against treating traditional knowledge and formal institutions as competing substitutes. Durable watershed governance may depend on institutional arrangements that preserve Indigenous authority and knowledge while connecting them to broader regulatory capacity.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

The community sample was purposive rather than statistically representative, and the co-governance result comes partly from a model whose parameters embed assumptions and field interpretation. It should inform governance design, not be read as a universal causal estimate.

SOURCE

Human Ecology
View original evidence ↗

A new mixed-methods study in Colombia’s upper Ariguaní basin links Indigenous water knowledge, sacred sites, land-use change and socio-hydrological modeling.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →
Institutional report

Pacific conservation leaders leave Nouméa with 16 collective priorities—and an implementation test

Evidence
Institutional / NGO report
Geography
Pacific Island countries and territories / Nouméa, New Caledonia
System
Pacific terrestrial, freshwater and marine systems

WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS

More than 400 delegates at the 11th Pacific Islands Conference on Nature Conservation and Protected Areas adopted the Môo Mâ Awé Declaration, committing to 16 Regional Collective Priorities by 2030. The conference also advanced regional tools including the Pacific Islands State of Environment and Conservation Report 2026, with repeated emphasis on community leadership, restoration and Pacific knowledge systems.

WHY IT MATTERS / OUR READ

The intelligence here is institutional: the Pacific now has a more explicit shared conservation agenda and evidence base. The next question is whether those priorities change financing, national implementation and on-the-ground management rather than remaining conference commitments.

CAVEATS / UNCERTAINTY

The declaration and regional tools are governance instruments, not measured ecological outcomes, and participation does not guarantee implementation. Progress will depend on financing, national policy, community authority and sustained delivery after the conference.

SOURCE

SPREP · Regional conference outcome
View original evidence ↗

The Môo Mâ Awé Declaration and new regional evidence products put community leadership, restoration and Pacific knowledge into a shared 2030 conservation agenda.

Read the Wild Lands assessment →

Keep exploring

Follow the systems. Find the connections.

WildlifeLandWaterOceansClimateCitiesOne HealthGovernanceMethods / Monitoring
Browse the archive →